Lynch v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• subsequent in-court identification not tainted by prior photographic identification when, as here, victim had ample opportunity to observe perpetrator, brief period of time elapsed between crime and identification, and certainty of victim’s selection of photograph was apparent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Foster v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-03-18· cited 13×
• Lucas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-04-16· cited 11×
• Lawrence v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-01-08· cited 8×
• Baxter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-09-28· cited 8×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-03-05· cited 4×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Eiland v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1980-07-01· cited 22×
• Tate v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-01-24· cited 12×