Skip to main content
· 10/21/1970

Lynch v. Keck

Citations

  • 263 N.E.2d 176
  • 147 Ind. App. 570
  • 1970 Ind. App. LEXIS 419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that owners of a dominant estate had a duty to keep the easement in a proper state of repair to avoid damaging the servient estate through erosion
  • easement holder may be liable for injuries caused by holder's neglect to repair
  • “Where the obstructions are of a permanent and continuous nature and the damages for each day’s obstruction are insignificant, the remedy of successive actions at law for such damages is inadequate, and equity will interpose by injunction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.