Lynch v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court improperly found that possible impact of unessential terms invalidated written memorandum stating essential terms of contract with reasonable certainty
• ‘‘[a] memorandum under the Statute of Frauds, because it serves a purpose different than that of an integrated writing invoking the parol evidence rule,4 does not exclude the introduction of consistent additional nonessential parol terms’’ [emphasis added; footnote added]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).