LYNCH, JAMES v. CORCORAN, MICHAEL P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a litigant impliedly consents to jurisdiction where the litigant joins a case and files multiple documents without raising the issue
• concluding that plaintiff “impliedly consented” to bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction after filing a proof of claim
• holding that a litigant may impliedly consent to the entry of a final order if they appear before the bankruptcy court “without an objection”
• holding that the claimant impliedly consented to entry of a final order by the bankruptcy court, where he filed several pleadings without objection to the court’s authority to enter a final order
• holding that the Third Circuit could not transfer or remand plaintiff’s hostile work environment and wrongful termination claims to another court to be re-litigated because they were discharged under 11 U.S.C. § 524 and § 1141(d)(1)(A)
• holding that the Third Circuit could not transfer or remand plaintiff’s hostile work environment and wrongful termination claims to another court to be re-litigated because they were discharged under 11 U.S.C. § 524 and § 1141(d)(1)(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).