Lyn-Lea Travel Corp. v. American Airlines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant could raise fraudulent inducement as defense in breach of contract action without offending the ADA's pre-emption provision because \fraudulent conduct precludes the requisite mutual assent\
• holding that defendant could raise fraudulent inducement as defense in breach of contract action without offending the ADA’s pre-emption provision because “fraudulent conduct precludes the required mutual assent”
• holding that the ADA does not preempt breach of contract claims
• noting that motions for “leave to amend [should be granted] ‘freely,’ and the language of this rule ‘evinces a bias in favor of granting leave to amend.’”
• holding that ADA doesn’t preempt routine state-law contract claims
• noting that fraudulent inducement is a “core concept” of contract law and observing that because “contract law is, at its ‘core,’ uniform and non-diverse, there is little risk of inconsistent state adjudications of contractual obligations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).