Skip to main content
· 11/23/2015

LYMAN Et Al. v. CELLCHEM INTERNATIONAL, LLC

Citations

  • 335 Ga. App. 266
  • 779 S.E.2d 474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the denial of a motion for new trial when some evidence supported a jury’s verdict that appellant employee’s use of a thumb drive without authority to do so amounted to computer theft and trespass under OCGA § 16-9-93

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ray, Barnes, McMillian, Divisions

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.