Skip to main content
· 11/7/1995

Lyman D. Spurlock v. The Federal Bureau of Investigation

Citations

  • 69 F.3d 1010
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 14839
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8588
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 31361
  • 1995 WL 649567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the district court has inherent authority to strike improper filings “to 22 promulgate and enforce rules for the management of litigation”
  • stating that a district court has “inherent power over the administration of GIBSON V. CITY OF PORTLAND 43 its business [and] inherent authority to . . . enforce rules for the management of litigation” (citations omitted)
  • discussing a district p 7 || court's “inherent authority to manage its docket”
  • discussing a 16 district court’s “inherent authority to manage its docket”
  • \An appellee who fails to file a cross-appeal cannot attack a judgment with a view towards enlarging his own rights.\
  • the district court has inherent authority to strike improper filings “to promulgate and 11 ||enforce rules for the management of litigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Alarcon, Leavy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.