Lyles v. State
Citations
- 41 Tex. 172
Syllabus
<p>1. Juror.—Though the code does not- in express terms make the inability of the jury to speak and understand the language in which the proceedings on the trial are conducted a cause of disqualification, a trial by such a jury is violative of sec. 16, art. 1, of the Bill of Rights.</p> <p>2. Trial by jury.—Proceedings i'n the courts must be conducted in the English language, except in the counties of Nueces, San Patricio, and Refugio, in which the proceedings may be conducted in the Spanish language before justices of the peace, but only when neither the justice of the peace nor the parties are able to write or understand the English language.</p> <p>3. Charge of court.—It is error to charge the jury that “if they believe the defendant killed the deceased without lawful excuse or provocation, but without express malice,” they should find him guilty of murder in the second degree. Such a charge excludes from the jury the consideration of the crime of manslaughter.</p> <p>4. See statement of the case for facts which require the law of manslaughter to be given In charge to the jury:</p> <p>5. Sew trial.-—When there are two jointly indicted and tried, one of whom is acquitted and the other convicted, it is error in the court to refuse -a now trial to the party convicted, when liis motion is sustained by the affidavit of the party acquitted to facts material to the defense, which, by reason of the joint trial, could not he used in evidence.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing a felony conviction because the trial court permitted several people who did not speak and understand English to serve on the jury
- reversing a felony conviction because the trial court permitted several people who did not speak and understand English to serve on the jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Devine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Whitmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-07-12· cited 102×
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Missouri· 1879-04-15· cited 39×
- State v. DrakeOregon Supreme Court· 1884-10-15· cited 31×
- State v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1923-02-23· cited 15×
- Jimmy Vera v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2016-06-15· cited 8×
- Siavash Sayyadi v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-03-08· cited 7×
- McCampbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1880-07-01· cited 1×
- Kevin Ashley Parnell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2020-09-24
- Huebner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1878-07-01
- Rucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1880-07-01
- Nolen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1880-07-01
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1882-07-01
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1882-07-01
- Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1911-11-01
- Town of Trinidad v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1880-04-15
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.