Skip to main content
· 2/15/1833

Lyles v. Martin

Citations

  • 5 La. 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that agency cannot \avoid application of Accardi by simply disclaiming any binding effect in the [D]irective itself\ and that \[t]o find otherwise would render the teachings of Accardi and its progeny meaningless\
  • holding that agency cannot “avoid application of Accardi by simply disclaiming any binding effect in the [D]irective itself” and that “[t]o find otherwise would render the teachings of Accardi and its progeny meaningless”
  • holding that agency cannot “avoid application of Accardi by simply disclaiming any binding effect in the [D]irective itself” and that “[t]o find otherwise would render the teachings of Accardi and its progeny meaningless”
  • noting that violation of \internal policy\ implicates Accardi doctrine if it \pertains to individual rights\
  • finding irreparable harm when asylum-seekers detained at facility failing to follow Parole Directive
  • finding irreparable harm when asylum-seekers detained at facility failing to follow Parole Directive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.