Lyle v. Purdy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring authentication when the plaintiff did not “admit[] through statements or conduct that the document attached to the motion to compel arbitration is the agreement into which he entered.”
• “[Plaintiff] submitted an affidavit acknowledging that he entered into a loan agreement, but disputing that he had ever seen any of the provisions of the document that [defendant] attached to its motion to compel arbitration.”
• failure to properly authenticate evidence is sufficient to preclude the court from considering it, even if the evidence would have been admissible but for the failure to authenticate (citing Estate of Brown v. Thomas, 771 F.3d 1001, 1005-06 (7th Cir. 2014)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).