Lyddy v. Long Island City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Board’s factual findings are binding on appeal when substantial record evidence supports them
• explaining that the Board, and not the referee, is the final arbiter of credibility determinations
• applying the test set forth in Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951), to determine whether a finding is supported by substantial evidence
• rejecting argument that the referee should have the exclusive power to resolve credibility
• rejecting argument that Referee should have the exclusive power to resolve credibility
• substantial evidence is defined as what a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).