Skip to main content
· 3/18/1994

Lwt, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Yildiz G. Childers, and Childers Manufacturing Company, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant

Citations

  • 19 F.3d 539
  • 23 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 73
  • 39 Fed. R. Serv. 47
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5113
  • 1994 WL 86411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The fact that plaintiff later abandoned that defense in the South Carolina litigation does not affect the admissibility of those pleadings as evidence in this action.”
  • “a limitation or disclaimer of warranties will be given effect only if it formed part of the basis of the bargain when the sales contract was entered into”
  • Rule 9(b) requires particularity “so that the defendant can prepare 20 an adequate answer”
  • Rule 9(b) requires particularity “so that the defendant can prepare 20 an adequate answer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Kelly, Brimmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.