L.W. v. Dee Grubbs, Thomas Nelson Marlin Hutton Richard Hill James Nanson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where prison “independently created the not draw any premature inferences. opportunity for and facilitated” an inmate’s assault of a prison employee, it was subject to § 1983 liability
• holding that a female prison nurse had stated a claim under 1983 when she alleged that the defendant prison officials selected a violent sex offender to work alone with her in the prison clinic, and she was subsequently raped by the offender
• holding state employees could be liable for the rape of a 5 registered nurse assigned to work alone with a known, violent sex-offender
• holding state employees could be liable for the rape of a 11 registered nurse assigned to work alone with a known, violent sex-offender
• holding state employees could be liable for the rape of a 9 registered nurse assigned to work alone with a known, violent sex-offender
• holding state employees could be liable for the rape of a 5 registered nurse assigned to work alone with a known, violent sex-offender

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).