Skip to main content
· 2/14/2002

Luza v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Citations

  • 33 F. App'x 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding \[o]f particular concern\ the defendant's \continued denial that he did anything wrong despite the fact that he received customer complaints about the violations ... [but] he did not take steps necessary to halt the misrepresentations in a four-year span\
  • “Awareness of fraudulent practices and failure to act within one’s authority to control such practices is sufficient to establish liability.”
  • Defendants selling medical discount card deceived consumers into believing defendants were selling insurance by using terms “like ‘copay,’ ‘premium,’ and ‘deductible’ which are commonly associated with insurance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Trott, Wardlaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.