Skip to main content
· 7/16/2004

Luy v. Baltimore Police Department

Citations

  • 326 F. Supp. 2d 682
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13955
  • 2004 WL 1634976

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • entitlement to a name-clearing hearing “does not arise by harm to reputation alone”
  • substantial compliance “still ‘requires some effort to provide the requisite notice…’”
  • “The court may consider a document submitted by the defendant in support of a motion to dismiss, however, ‘[if] it was integral to and explicitly relied on in the complaint and [if] the plaintiffs do not challenge its authenticity.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blake

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.