· 7/16/2004
Luy v. Baltimore Police Department
Citations
- 326 F. Supp. 2d 682
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13955
- 2004 WL 1634976
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- entitlement to a name-clearing hearing “does not arise by harm to reputation alone”
- substantial compliance “still ‘requires some effort to provide the requisite notice…’”
- “The court may consider a document submitted by the defendant in support of a motion to dismiss, however, ‘[if] it was integral to and explicitly relied on in the complaint and [if] the plaintiffs do not challenge its authenticity.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blake
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.