Skip to main content
· 7/20/1982

Luxton v. Luxton

Citations

  • 648 P.2d 315
  • 98 N.M. 276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when an appellant did not insure that exhibits relevant to the issues were part of the record on appeal, the Court would rule against her substantial evidence issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easley, Sosa, Riordan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.