Lutz v. Peine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• violation of a duty or a law by plaintiff is contributory negligence that bars plaintiffs recovery if it is a proximate cause of the injury
• no suspicion of compromise verdict can be made because of inadequate damages when the jury found plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miller v. Zep Manufacturing Co.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1991-07-12· cited 47×
• Comeau v. Rupp
  D. Kansas· 1992-10-29· cited 39×
• Hubbard v. Estate of Havlik
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1974-01-26· cited 13×
• Fitzpatrick v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1998-02-27· cited 11×
• Eckdall v. Negley
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1981-03-06· cited 4×
• Gans v. C.F. Menninger Memorial Hospital
  D. Kansas· 1995-05-19

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Timmerman v. Schroeder
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1969-05-17· cited 33×
• Ziegelasch v. Durr
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1958-06-07· cited 32×
• Applegate v. Home Oil Co.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1958-04-12· cited 30×
• Allen v. Ellis
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1963-04-06· cited 27×