Skip to main content
· 12/18/1894

Lutz v. Mahan

Citations

  • 80 Md. 233
  • 30 A. 645
  • 1894 Md. LEXIS 118

Syllabus

<p>Revocation of Letters af Administration — Renunciation—False Statement in Judicial Proceedings.</p> <p>Letters of administration were granted to a son of an intestate upon his ex-parte application and statement that there was no other son. There was, in fact, an elder son and two daughters, but no widow ot the intestate. Held, that the letters so granted should be revoked, and the Orphans’ Court should proceed as if this administration had never taken place.</p> <p>A voluntary renunciation of the right to administer, once made, cannot afterwards be withdrawn.</p> <p>When a judicial act has been obtained by fraudulent means, the Court must condemn the means and annul the result obtained by them. It will never speculate as to whether the same result may not be reached again under different circumstances.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • jury tried case in circuit court involving selling alcohol to students at the University of Michigan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyd, Briscoe, Bryan, McSherry, Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.