Skip to main content

Lutz v. Lutz

Citations

  • 302 Ga. 500
  • 807 S.E.2d 336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when a party \did not raise this issue in his application for discretionary review ... it is not properly before us for review\
  • holding that when a party “did not raise this issue in his application for discretionary review … it is not properly before us for review”
  • holding that when a party did not raise an issue in his application for discretionary review, the issue was not properly before the appellate court for review
  • holding that when a party did not raise an issue in his application for discretionary review, the issue was not properly before the appellate court for review
  • father’s prior-year annual bonus, while not a guaranteed source of income, properly included when considering the child support obligation of the parents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.