Lutz v. Chromatex, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the definition of \response\ did not include medical monitoring
• “[T]he legislature obviously had the 24 rights of private citizens in mind when it drafted the [SWMA] but elected to protect those rights by way of existing common law remedies, such as actions for negligence and nuisance.”
• court adopts Coburn rationale as its own

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).