Luttrell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court did not err by asking, at the request of the State, whether any prospective jurors were prejudiced against undercover drug agents
• State properly allowed to inquire if any prospective juror distrusted narcotics agents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Qualls v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-09-29· cited 28×
• Tucker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-02-01· cited 26×
• Pope v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-08-19· cited 17×
• Hare v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1979-10-30· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hinkle v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1973-04-17· cited 22×
• Osner v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1974-11-26· cited 19×
• Funches v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1975-06-17· cited 13×
• Lang v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1966-02-10· cited 12×
• Osner v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1975-03-13· cited 4×
• Funches v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1975-09-18· cited 2×