Skip to main content
· 3/26/2012

Lutsenko v. Pshnka

Citations

  • 282 F.R.D. 5
  • 82 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 215
  • 2012 WL 987583
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) and explaining that counsel was obligated to monitor the docket and respond to the court’s filing deadlines even though he “never personally registered to receive notice” from the court’s electronic filing system

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.