Luthy v. Proulx

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the MTCA bars suits for intentional torts including abuse of process, malicious prosecution, and intentional infliction of emotional distress
• allowing leave to amend to provide sufficient facts regarding policies of deliberate indifference
• dismissing malicious prosecution claim against the city of Attleboro because it alleged an “intentional tort[] committed by a City employee which [is] explicitly exempted from the scope of municipal liability under the MTCA.”
• “Negligent infliction of emotional distress is a personal injury for WCA purposes . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).