Skip to main content
· 4/1/1978

Luthi v. Evans

Citations

  • 576 P.2d 1064
  • 223 Kan. 622
  • 61 Oil & Gas Rep. 139
  • 1978 Kan. LEXIS 262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Italicized words were so emphasized in the original; this Court has added the bolded language for emphasis
  • “A description of the property conveyed should be considered sufficient if it identifies the property or affords the means of identification within the instrument itself or by specific reference to other instruments recorded in the office of the register of deeds.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.