Luther v. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an enrolled student at a public university who is dismissed for disciplinary reasons possesses no constitutionally-protected liberty interest
• stating that while a student rights policy “may not itself create enforceable contract rights, it may nevertheless bear on whether [the student] had an entitlement to continued enrollment”
• “Doe is not alleging that a state statute creates his property right, so Goss does not help him.”
• adequacy of process at the appellate stage of a student disciplinary proceeding
• “[The plaintiff] can cite no case in which the Supreme Court or Fourth Circuit has recognized a property right to continued enrollment in a public college or university—much less a case recognizing that the Commonwealth of Virginia has created such a right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).