Luther Stanley v. Cottrell Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, provided transcripts are necessary for the case, a prevailing party may be reimbursed for both a printed and electronic deposition transcripts
• upholding district court’s award for cost of both printed and electronically recorded transcripts of a deposition because it was not unnecessarily obtained
• permitting costs for “both printed and electronically of the same deposition as long as each transcript is necessarily obtained for use in a case”
• permitting costs for “both printed and electronically of the same deposition as long as each transcript is necessarily obtained for use in a case”
• finding the term “or” ambiguous where “[t]he plain language of the statute contain[ed] no limiting words or phrases — such as ‘either’ . . . .”
• finding the term “or” ambiguous where “[t]he plain language of the statute contain[ed] no limiting words or phrases — such as ‘either’ . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).