Luthart v. Danesh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Iskanian and Williams to stand for the proposition that fees should be allocated among aggrieved employees on a pro rata basis
• interpreting Iskanian and Williams to stand for the proposition that fees should be allocated among aggrieved employees on a pro rata basis
• rejecting plaintiff’s argument that, since PAGA is a type of qui tam action, the entire 25% of the civil penalties not allocated to the government should go to the aggrieved employee who brings the PAGA suit
• rejecting plaintiff’s argument that, since PAGA is a type of qui tam action, the entire 25% of the civil penalties not allocated to the government should go to the aggrieved employee who brings the PAGA suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).