Lutes v. Goldin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Brown “to bar constitutional challenges arising under claims of federal employment discrimination”
• statements by defendant in speeches and newspaper articles regarding commitment to diversity do not show discriminatory motive with respect to plaintiff
• employer's \concern for diversity in the workplace\ is not evidence of an intent to discriminate
• “Courts in this jurisdiction have relied upon Brown [v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 (1976),] and Thorne [v. Cavazos, 744 F. Supp. 348, 351-52 (D.D.C.1990)
• denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment on ADEA retaliation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).