Skip to main content
· 5/16/1932

Lutcher & Moore Lumber Co. v. Beaumont

Citations

  • 49 S.W.2d 726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a promise was implied to refund a pro rata share of the license fee paid by the plaintiff covering the period during which the government had abrogated his license
  • a promise was implied to refund a pro rata share of the license fee paid by the plaintiff covering the period during which the government had abrogated his license

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cureton, Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.