· 5/16/1932
Lutcher & Moore Lumber Co. v. Beaumont
Citations
- 49 S.W.2d 726
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a promise was implied to refund a pro rata share of the license fee paid by the plaintiff covering the period during which the government had abrogated his license
- a promise was implied to refund a pro rata share of the license fee paid by the plaintiff covering the period during which the government had abrogated his license
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cureton, Sharp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.