Luster v. Collins (In Re Collins)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the EITC was not exempt under Louisiana’s statute, which only exempted payments made under the state’s public assistance scheme
• finding EITC not exempt under Louisiana’s statute, which exempted “money payments under this Title” because the title in question dealt with state welfare and assistance
• “The canons of interpretation are suspicious of surplussage [sic].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).