Skip to main content
· 8/22/2002

Lusk v. Williams (In Re Williams)

Citations

  • 282 B.R. 267
  • 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 932
  • 40 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1
  • 2002 WL 1962123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the general rule is that when a question of fact is put in issue by the pleadings, is submitted to the trier of fact for its determination, and is determined, that question of fact has been actually litigated
  • attorney’s malpractice is not a per se denial of a full 24 and fair opportunity to litigate; inquiry is whether party had 25 adequate notice of the issue and was afforded the opportunity to 26 participate in its determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman Ray Mullins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.