Lusk v. Verderosa
Syllabus
Martha \Linda\ Lusk, Ph.D., argues the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on her tortious interference with contract cause of action by ruling a school administrator's contract could effectively never be tortiously interfered with pursuant to section 59-24-15 of the South Carolina Code (2020) and the supreme court's response to a certified question in Henry-Davenport v. School District of Fairfield County, 391 S.C. 85, 705 S.E.2d 26 (2011). We affirm as modified.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-13· cited 261×
- Fleming v. RoseSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-07-22· cited 246×
- Todd v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-29· cited 86×
- Hansson v. Scalise Builders of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-08-13· cited 55×
- Medical Univ. of South Carolina v. ArnaudSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-09-07· cited 34×
- Dutch Fork Development Group II v. Sel Properties, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-08-22· cited 21×
- Johnson v. Spartanburg County School District No. 7Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-23· cited 13×
- Henry-Davenport v. School DistrictD. South Carolina· 2011-06-03· cited 4×
- Henry-Davenport v. School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-01-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.