Lusk v. Smith
Citations
- 71 Kan. 550
- 81 P. 173
- 1905 Kan. LEXIS 180
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Contracts — Usury. It is an essential requisite to a usurious transaction that there be a loan, either expressed or implied.</p> <p>2. -Presumption Overcome. A son receiving $5000 from his mother stated to her that he could get her ten per cent, interest, and perhaps more. He deposited the amount to his credit in a bank “as agent,” and withdrew it on checks signed the same way. He gave his mother a memorandum-book in which he credited her with the principal sum, adding the words “to be loaned out.” Held, that these facts overcame any presumption of a usurious agreement which might arise from the payment of interest above the legal rate for over ten years by the son to his mother.</p> <p>3. --- Construction. Where an agreement to pay interest is subject to two constructions, one of which will make it usurious, and the other not, the court will adopt the latter.</p>
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cobb v. HartensteinUtah Supreme Court· 1915-10-07· cited 15×
- Jones v. NossamanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-12-08· cited 14×
- Lindsey v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-05-05· cited 10×
- Indian Springs State Bank v. Kelley's Auto Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1984-01-26· cited 3×
- In Re Estate of JohnstonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1956-12-08· cited 2×
- Wheat v. HilkeySupreme Court of Kansas· 1938-06-11
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.