Lusk v. Ryder Integrated Logistics

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant’s recognition of plaintiffs lifting restriction did not constitute regarding the plaintiff as disabled
• stating that evidence showing an impairment merely affects a major life activity is generally insufficient
• explaining that “[w]here the recognition of Plaintiffs limitations is not an erroneous perception, but is instead a recognition of fact, a finding that Plaintiff was regarded as disabled is inappropriate”
• affirming summary judgment where plaintiff offered no evidence comparing his lifting abilities to those of the general populace
• affirming grant of summary judgment where the plain- tiff failed to produce evidence that a forty-pound lifting restriction was “sub- stantially limiting”
• granting summary judgment for employer when employee failed to show his “lifting restriction” substantially limited a major life activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).