Lusk v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• failure to instruct on corroboration requirement was harmless error where uncontested out-of-court statement gave same account of the defendant’s involvement as accomplice witness testimony
• accomplice witness instructions required if the record demonstrates “a substantial objective basis for believing that, more likely than not,” a witness aided or abetted in the commission of an offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).