Lusk v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is, of course, well settled that the employer or its insurer may be estopped to rely upon the one-year statute of limitations.”
• “[E]quitable estoppel embraces not only ideas conveyed by words written or spoken and things actually done but includes the silence of one under a duty to speak and his omission to act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).