Lusby v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[w]hen a point is argued but unsupported by citations and authorities, the court might well decide not to trouble itself with independent research, and reject the point on its merits, depending on the nature of the issue.”
• reversible error to admit expert opinion based on reports covered by § 409

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).