Skip to main content
· 6/19/2007

Lusa v. Grunberg

Citations

  • 923 A.2d 795
  • 101 Conn. App. 739
  • 2007 Conn. App. LEXIS 250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court can rely on guidelines worksheet not submitted into evidence if figures going into calculations on worksheet substantiated by evidence produced at trial
  • ‘‘the phrase [including but not limited to] convey[s] a clear intention that the items listed in the definition do not constitute an exhaustive or exclusive list’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harper, Lavine, Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.