Lurie v. Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “futility is a Rule 15(a) 9 consideration, not a Rule 16(b) consideration”
• “Allowing the [moving party] to add claims merely so that it can engage in a tit-for-tat litigation strategy surely is not what the Federal Rules mean by ‘good cause.’”
• “[A]fter the deadlines provided by a scheduling order have passed, the [Rule 16] standard must be satisfied to justify leave to amend the pleadings.”
• “[A]fter the deadlines provided by a scheduling order have passed, the [Rule 16] standard must be satisfied to justify leave to amend the pleadings.”
• focusing on “reasons” for “delay” under Rule 16(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).