Skip to main content
· 12/13/1971

Luria v. LURIA

Citations

  • 220 Pa. Super. 168
  • 286 A.2d 922
  • 1971 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court’s taking of evidence pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1028(c)(2) was required before ruling on preliminary objection to jurisdiction, and remanding for factual findings by the trial court
  • reprimanding the lower court for making factual determinations without ordering the taking of depositions or the filing of interrogatories or both
  • when a fact dispute is raised by preliminary objections, the court is required to take evidence to resolve the dispute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, Oercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.