Luria Bros. & Co. v. Capitol Steel, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts should consider a youth’s age in determining a Fifth Amendment Miranda issue
• holding that neither officers nor courts may ignore “the effect of objective circumstances that, by their nature, are specific to children”
• holding that child’s age is relevant, although not necessarily determinative, in as sessing whether a child is in custody
• holding that neither officers nor courts may ignore “the effect of objective circumstances that, by their nature, are specific to children”
• holding that courts should consider a youth’s age in deter- mining a Fifth Amendment Miranda issue
• holding that \the age of a child subjected to police questioning is relevant to the custody analysis of Miranda \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).