Lupton v. Ohio State Racing Comm.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4984
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in ordering a new hearing before the Ohio State Racing Commission (\Racing Commission\), or in finding the Racing Commission hearing officer abused his discretion in granting the Racing Commission's motion to quash the subpoena of a witness. However, the trial court, like the Racing Commission, erred in defining \cruelty\ for the purpose of Adm.Code 3769-2-26(A)(9). Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part; cause remanded.
Judges: Dingus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.