Lunz v. Preiser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that even if district court had erred 24 in denying motion to amend, any error would be harmless because 25 the proposed amendment would have been barred by res judicata
• concluding that even if district court had erred 26 in denying motion to amend, any error would be harmless because -55- 1 the proposed amendment would have been barred by res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).