Lungren v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Keener II’s penalty interest holding on the grounds that the Alpha I plaintiffs “did not concede the ground that the transactions at issue were shams”
• characterizing .the comment in Keener II as dictum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).