Skip to main content
· 5/8/1978

Lundy v. Employment Division

Citations

  • 34 Or. App. 265
  • 578 P.2d 476
  • 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 2447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an order to comply with an administrative subpoena, arising in an action to enforce that subpoena, was an appealable judgment even without a contempt finding because it finally determined the rights of the parties
  • noting that an order to comply with an administrative subpoena, arising in an action to enforce that subpoena, was an appealable judgment even without a contempt finding because it finally determined the rights of the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buttler, Schwab, Tanzer, Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.