Tenth Circuit· 8/17/2010

Lundstrom v. Romero

Citations

616 F.3d 1108
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17136
2010 WL 3222048

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that neither the use of handcuffs nor of a gun necessarily renders an investigative detention unreasonable
holding that officer effectuated a reasonable seizure when she briefly pointed her gun at individual because officer’s view was obstructed and she became concerned individual was armed
holding that the warrantless seizure of a homeowner at his residence during a child welfare check was not justified by exigent circumstances because the homeowner posed no immediate threat of harm to anyone
finding that even “serious” allegations of child abuse did not make handcuffing a potential suspect reasonable
explaining that officers must have particularized reasonable suspicion before initiating an investigative detention
holding officers violated plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights when they handcuffed and detained her without first “undertak[ing] the most rudimentary investigation” and where “there was no ongoing emergency” or threat to their safety

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Ebel, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.