Lundell Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when “it is evident that the underlying facts as to the gist of the statement are the subject of a reasonable dispute ... it is for the jury to decide the meaning conveyed”
• holding that when \it is evident that the underlying facts as to the gist of the statement are the subject of a reasonable dispute . . . it is for the jury to decide the meaning conveyed\
• noting that whether an opinion falsely asserts a fact is a question for the jury
• finding substantial truth “when the sting of the implication is still present when the full chronology is laid out”
• finding substantial truth \when the sting of the implication is still present when the full chronology is laid out\
• finding a county’s garbage disposal problem to be a controversy involving questions of public concern

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).