Lund v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund/Garden City Plumbing & Heating, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of a single on-the-job injury was the subject of consecutive actions for workers’ compensation benefits, but neither res judicata nor collateral estoppel were implicated
• “Section 39-71- 709(3), MCA (1985), provides in pertinent part that ‘[a] worker who has elected to proceed under 39-71-703 may withdraw his election at any time and is entitled to receive indemnity benefits under 39-71-705 through 39-71-708 . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).