Lund v. Donahoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that special action relief is proper “when a party believes a trial court has ordered disclosure of material protected by a privilege or work product shield”
• describing the purpose of a “culprit hearing,” which assesses whether lawyer or party should be held responsible for a discovery violation, as “protecting a party from dispositive sanctions when the fault lies only with counsel”
• A culprit hearing is “aimed at protecting a party from dispositive sanctions when the fault lies only with counsel.”
• “Arizona has a long-favored practice of allowing full cross- examination of expert witnesses, including inquiry about the expert’s sources, relations with the hiring party and counsel, possible bias, and prior opinions”
• Attorneys’ concerns about privilege considerations hindered their compliance with compelling disclosure.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).