Lunardi v. Great-West Life Assurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that party was bound by provisions of document that he signed even though he claimed that he signed form without reviewing, at insurer’s insistence
• noting that an insured cannot withhold information and then fault his insurer for not discovering it
• finding good health provision to be a valid condition precedent and failure to notify insurer about a change condition as required made the policy ineffective
• emphasizing the condition for good health provides insurer with a continuing right to be advised of any health changes between the application and delivery date
• upholding good health provision where owners/insureds did not review the application and the agent did not point out the relevant paragraph
• finding plaintiff did not meet the condition precedent where application indicated the application responses must remain true at time of payment and delivery, otherwise the policy was ineffective

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).